Info

ViewLegal Podcast

View Legal is a specialist law firm, focusing on tax, structuring, asset protection, business succession and estate planning. The founders of View Legal are committed to building a law firm that our friends would choose. View Legal is results focused and passionate about delivering solutions in a way that aligns with our 'SPS' - service and price satisfaction - guarantee.
RSS Feed Subscribe in Apple Podcasts
ViewLegal Podcast
2024
April
March
February


2023
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February


2022
November
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
February


2021
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March


2020
December
October
September
August
July
June
March
February


2019
October
September
August
July
June


2018
May
April
March
February


2017
November
October
September
August
July
June
April
March


2016
December
May
April
February
January


2015
October
September
August
July
June


All Episodes
Archives
Now displaying: January, 2016
Jan 19, 2016

This is a podcast of the webinar ‘Enduring powers of attorney and guardianship – everything you need to know’ held on 17 November 2015.


The webinar was presented by Tara Lucke and Patrick Ellwood, directors of View and widely recognised as two of Australia’s leading revenue focused lawyers in this area.

Arguably, one of the most contentious areas of estate planning relates to enduring powers of attorney and guardianship.

There is an array of issues that must be taken into account in relation to appointing attorneys and guardians.

In this 60-minute presentation, we explored some of the key things that advisers must address, including:

  1. how to structure the appointment of more than one attorney;
  2. the interrelationship between attorneys, enduring attorneys, guardians, executors and binding death benefit nominations;
  3. the interplay of these arrangements across state and international borders;
  4. the role of state government departments; and
  5. the implications of recent court decisions, including the high court’s decision in Stanford.
1